Blackhawk World

Michigan’s Public Schools Face Financial Ruin: A Boring Topic

Print the article

This entry was posted on 4/24/2007 12:00 AM and is filed under Education.

That’s an alarming title –if you think about it, but no one seems to be thinking too much about the current state of ‘school finance’. Granted, it’s not a flashy topic. Not as flashy and controversial as, say, Rosey O’Donell. There is some passion where “taxes” are evoked and charged words like ‘accountability’ make it somewhat of a hot topic. But for the most part public schools, despite the 20 some years of scrutiny, attacks and changes, remain barely solvent, besides dull and except for the occasional championship team, very boring. Kids say that too often. Financially schools are at a perpetual, boring C-. Not enough money, or barely enough money is just too much of an old story.

Recently (this April) the State has warned of a $90-$100 per pupil reduction. (To put it into context, that’s about 3-4 teacher lay offs here at Fennville. -Fennville has already lost 13 teachers to early retirement, this year. That’s about 400 years of experience…to put it into context.) To think that this constant, reduction-type,-accountability  has no effect upon our students is to bury our heads in the 20th Century and hope Henry Ford’s assembly line will keep making cars to support our schools.

It’s easy to talk or complain about, but what do we REALLY do? It costs over $20,000 dollars a year (usually much more) to meet the needs of a special education student. A ‘regular ed. Student’ is supposed to be educated within the $7,600 and some change the state grants. The Feds kick in about 8%, then mandate expenditures of around 15% with No Child Left Behind and the rest comes from you and I. Some people offer simple solutions: close the schools. Lay off teachers and administrators. Just teach with a piece of chalk, etc. The simple suggestions sound easy –especially when you are angry and of course, are not feasible. Not yet anyway.

For almost a century Michigan received a big pay off for little public school investment. Workers could add parts to the assembly line and go to Friday night games for what amounted to chump change. Kids got a good assembly-line-style education. The Russians gave us a little scare with their Sputniks, but we don’t scare easy. We outspent them, buried THEM and went back to our comfortable lives of barely being aware of Kosovo or Baghdad, let alone what our kids were learning in school.

However, whatever they were learning did not seem to match what was happening in the world around us. If you haven’t noticed there has not been very many shift changes at the local factory. Medical technicians are reading our MRI’s (magnetic resonance images) in Australia. Software companies in India are writing programs to deal with unemployment in Indiana. Mortgage companies have their properties titles’ researched by people in front of computers in cities like Bangalor, India; places we cannot pronounce, let alone locate on a map. We buy fuel efficient cars from Japan and pay for expensive gasoline here. Walmart is the nation’s largest employer (!) and their product labels say, over and over, Made in China.

Yes, the times, as they say, are a changin’: It takes two minimum wage workers, adjusted for inflation, to earn what just one worker did in the 60’s. (Holly Slkar) And the news gets even grimmer. Since 2000 college-educated workers’ wages have fallen steadily. In 2005 Americans borrowed more money than they earned. (Parade Magazine) Business Week: “China’s competitive edge is shifting from low-cost workers to state-of-the-art-manufacturing. India is creating world-class innovation hubs, and its companies are far better performers than China’s.” In the U.S. we try to remain competitive by cutting wages and benefits. Our competitors gain the edge over us by moving ahead with investments in technology, innovation and an educated work force. Among the world’s 100 largest corporations in 2005, only 30 some were U.S. companies. Yet Americans work 200 more hours a year than our counterparts in European countries. (Holly Sklar) We work more for less and less. Both parents, too often, work more for less and less

And in the same article, A High-Road Economy: (http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/03/17/wanted_a_highroad_economy.php)

from a study done by the prestigious MIT of 500 international companies, "Contrary to the widely held belief of many managers, we conclude that solutions that depend on driving down costs by reducing wages and social benefits —are always dead ends. . . The activities that succeed over time are, in contrast, those that build on continuous learning and innovation."

We have students who have never intentionally opened the (paper) pages of an encyclopedia, but who can access the CIA fact book online. They can look at their home from a camera in orbit.  MySpace, a social networking web site, has over a 100 million members. 61% are teenagers. They have messages, photos, chat rooms and yes, predators, stalking those cyber neighborhoods. We know of campus killings even before the victims know they are being literally murdered. No, this is not our fathers’ world. And shockingly, horribly, it might not be our children’s world anymore.

Our public schools, with what little monies they have, must prepare our kids for a future with all the above feature. It can be frightening or exciting depending on how good your community’s school really is. And it is more frightening if you don’t know this or don’t really care.

So is school finance a boring topic?  Yes. Is it important? You, as a citizen, will have to determine that.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
    • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.